About Me

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
I am a left-leaning Independent and self-proclaimed political junkie who is most interested in LGBT and human rights. You'll definitely see this in my essays and posts.

Monday, July 11, 2011

No Deal: My Letter to the President

Dear Barack Obama,

No deal, Mister President!  No, I’m not talking about your capitulation on our nation’s solvent social safety net, I’m talking about any deal to trim the deficit whatsoever in conjunction with this debt ceiling vote.  I, and more than likely, the majority of the American people, want to see this debt ceiling vote come to a head with no political bipartisanship affecting its outcome.

The American debt ceiling is not a tool to use as a weapon against the heads of the American people and the economy, nor is it negotiable, raising it to pay our debts and keep the government functioning is constitutionally mandated; you, Mister President and constitutional scholar, should already know this.  If you offer any type of deal, be it good or bad, even from a progressive stand-point, this will open the Pandora’s Box for what can be leveraged with the debt ceiling vote, so offer no deal!

Offer no deal and use your constitutional and executive authority to raise the debt ceiling yourself with the aid of the Treasury Department; our economy is at stake, America is at stake, Americans are at stake, do not throw any of these things or people under the bus with meaningless political theater.  Allowing any deal undermines the authority of the executive and sets a precedent for others who will follow this Congress to use the debt ceiling as leverage against a sitting president.  I and the American people understand the deficit needs to be tamed, however, I must urge you that doing so with the Full, Faith, and Credit of the United States and the economies of other nations which rely on our economy to keep the markets stable and fair with proper competition literally at gun point would be the destruction of any recovery made thus far since the end of the Great Recession.

Sincerely,

A Concerned American Citizen

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Opposing Same-Sex Marriage is un-American

The Constitutional Argument for Same-Sex Marriage Equality


Banning marriage equality for same-sex couples is and will likely always be unconstitutional in the United States.  State statutes and constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage violate the first, fifth, and fourteenth amendments.  The first amendment promises the right to freedom of speech, same-sex marriage bans curtail that right.  The fifth amendment states, "No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty...without due process of law[...]"; allowing a public vote on banning same-sex marriage is a violation of the due process clause of those people adversely affected by the law that deprives those people of life and liberty.

The fourteenth amendment is the most obviously violated of them all when marriage equality is denied to same-sex couples.  The fourteenth amendment is broken up into four parts, or sections, less the enforcement section.  Bans on same-sex marriage easily violate the first section of the fourteenth amendment, which states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."  In this amendment, the due process clause is viewed as so important to the fabric of the United States and for the protection of its citizens, the clause is reiterated.

As for the actual body of the constitution, the so-called "'Defense' of Marriage Act" (DOMA) is a major violation of Article Four.  Article Four states, "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof" and "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States".  DOMA gives permission to the states to ignore these clauses completely in the case of same-sex marriage.

I am gay and therefore will always support marriage equality for same-sex couples, but as a supporter of the United States constitution and as an American, even if I was personally against this, I would still feel compelled to support marriage equality for same-sex couples on the basis of the law.  I do believe it would be un-American to take action contrary to the support of marriage equality for same-sex couples.

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

#GOP Field Much Worse Than Before!

After watching the first two Republican Debates, the first one being on Fox and the second on CNN, I have noticed just how blatant these candidates are being when waging divisive culture wars and trying to out-"right" (far out-"right") their other opponents.  When I was first able to vote, being the math-minded, logical person that I am, I created a point-system to rate the candidates depending on their answers to certain questions during the debate.  The point-system has been extremely reliable in picking a candidate who was more in line with progressive values throughout the nation.  Picking a president is not about his charisma and how well he or she can spin a topic into his or her favor.

A candidate can either gain or lose the points depending on the topics in which he or she answers listed herein:

Civil Rights = 600 points
Workers Rights = 500
Gay Rights = 1000
Economy = 300
Corporations = 500
Iraq = 200
Afghanistan = 300
Pakistan = 200
Libya = 200
Israel = 300
Healthcare = 400
Medicare = 400
Social Security = 400
Defense Spending = 300
Fair Tax = 200
Middle Class Rights = 400
Immigration = 200
Gun Laws = 100
Middle East Protests = 200
Abortion Rights = 600
Stem Cell (Embryonic) Research = 200
Education = 300
Energy = 300
Environment = 400
Drug Laws = 200
Tea Party = 300
Space & Technology = 200
Role of the Federal Government = 300
Debt Ceiling = 400
National Security = 300
Lying = Automatic 100 point deduction
Miss a Debate = Automatic 1000 point deduction

After watching two debates, here is where the GOP candidates stand:

Republican
Debates
M Bachmann
-6100
H Cain
-5300
N Gingrich
-4600
G Johnson
-1500
R Paul
-400
T Pawlenty
-5000
M Romney
-4700
R Santorum
-4800
Currently, Ron Paul is in the lead with negative 400 points; I must say, this is pretty sad.  The gay rights, Medicare, workers rights, healthcare, social security, debt ceiling, role of the federal government, and abortion issues killed all of these candidates.  They are just too far right, for my tastes, and I imagine mainstream Republicans.

Friday, February 18, 2011

The Afterlife, or Something Like it

Last weekend, I experienced a special occurrence that has only happened a handful of times within my life and has already affected me profoundly.  This weekend, I realized that I believe in the existence of some sort of afterlife.  To be exact:  I realized that the existence of an afterlife is logically possible.  You probably do not know this, but I am agnostic, that is I believe in a higher force of some sort, but have not acknowledged the identity of that force.  Now, I believe in an afterlife, sort of.

Up until my junior year of college, I was atheist, only believing in what is tangible.  What changed that is throughout my courses in civil engineering, math, physics, environmental science, chemistry, and sociology, I began to notice patterns that linked all natural aspects of those sciences to each other:  the natural logarithm.  At that moment, one of the special occurrences aforementioned happened:  I had the realization that without the existence of a higher force, this natural pattern could not exist and our multi-verse could fall into entropy.

This weekend, I was thinking about the Big Bang Theory and an article where Stephen Hawkins said because of the existence of gravity, spontaneously, universes could come into existence.  I started thinking more about this, now armed with what I had learned in math about gravity and the space-time continuum.  On the surface, it would seem that without the existence of large, massive objects, gravity could not exist.  Gravity not only warps the fabric of space-time, but it exists because space-time exists and space-time exists because gravity exists, therefore, space-time and gravity will always exist.

This is where my idea of the afterlife comes into play.  I have come to believe the afterlife exists along the fabric of space-time.  I still do not know what effect, if any, gravity plays in this vision of the afterlife. One idea is it may force, through trans-universal wormholes, our sentience to enter another universe and another life, or our sentience may just become one with the fabric of space-time forever, this, I still do not understand.  I am sure, in time, I will come to understand whether death is the end of the line for our sentience or if reincarnation actually is the next chapter, or this may be the end of that line of thought due to the lack of evidence.  I also know that I will likely never acknowledge the identity of the higher force I have come to believe exists.

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

More REPUBLICAN LIES

The GOP ran on a campaign touting jobs-creation, smaller government, and working harder for the American people! The first things they do when they get into office: waste time and tax-payer money in a futile attempt to repeal the job-creating, life-improving, deficit-reducing Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), attack women's reproductive rights by trying to redefine rape and incest, destroy families and attack marriages with so-called "marriage protection" amendments, and try to slow the implementation of the Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal, which would prevent the destruction of important military careers (jobs) and stop the waste of tax-payer money. Those of you who voted Republican last year, you've been had; thanks for voting to ruin America!

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Keith Olbermann Signs Off

This past Friday was a very sad day in honest journalism as we have learned very abruptly that Keith Olbermann was signing off even though he had two years left in his contract.  In a time where we need more in-depth honesty in the news, not less, we have lost a powerful light in an age that seems to be getting darker and darker.  Olbermann will be missed and so will, MSNBC’s “well-oiled Ferrari,” Countdown.

I have no doubt Keith’s sudden departure had something to do with the inevitable take-over, not merger, of NBC/MSNBC by the conservative media giant, Comcast.  It would seem that we liberals are being silenced not only within our own government, at times by our very own Democratic president, but in the media as well.  Were it not for Olbermann, MSNBC would not be the left-leaning, liberal media outlet it is today, and for that, among many other reasons, we must thank him.  Olbermann has given liberals a voice on the cable news medium that was needed sorely during the almost tyrannical Bush administration, the moral emptiness of the Republicans’ rise to near power within our Congress, and now during the tea party, gun-wielding, Congresswoman shooting insanity that is gripping America.

We can only hope MSNBC will continue to be the voice against that tyranny, moral emptiness, and insanity; however, most importantly, we can only hope MSNBC will continue to be a beacon of truth in what is becoming, in part due to Conservative media, America’s Dark Age.  Please excuse me if you think I am sounding a little melodramatic, but this nation is overwhelmed by news organizations giving a platform to groups who promote hate and a culture of fear against the government and liberals, CNN not withstanding!

My final message to Comcast and conservatives:  I will gladly take the biased liberal media at MSNBC over the lies spread by Fox News.  Lastly, to Keith Olbermann:  good luck in your future endeavors; I hope this is not the last we will hear from you because you are already extremely missed in an age when we need your voice more than ever before.

Friday, December 3, 2010

My Projection for DADT Repeal

    State
    Senators
    Yea/Nay/ Unknown
    Yea Total
    Nay Total
    AK
    Begich (D)
    Murkowski (R)
    Y
    U
    1
    0
    AL
    Shelby (R)
    Sessions (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    AZ
    McCain (R)
    Kyl (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    AR
    Lincoln (D)
    Pryor (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    CA
    Feinstein (D)
    Boxer (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    CO
    Udall (D)
    Bennet (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    CT
    Dodd (D)
    Lieberman (I)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    DE
    Carper (D)
    Coons (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    FL
    Nelson (D)
    LeMieux (R)
    Y
    N
    1
    1
    GA
    Chambliss (R)
    Isakson (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    HI
    Inouye (D)
    Akaka (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    ID
    Crapo (R)
    Risch (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    IL
    Durbin (D)
    Kirk (R)*
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    IN
    Lugar (R)
    Bayh (D)
    N
    Y
    1
    1
    IA
    Grassley (R)
    Harkin (D)
    N
    Y
    1
    1
    KS
    Brownback (R)
    Roberts (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    KY
    McConnell (R)
    Bunning (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    LA
    Landrieu (D)
    Vitter (R)
    Y
    N
    1
    1
    ME
    Snowe (R)
    Collins (R)*
    U
    Y
    1
    0
    MD
    Mikulski (D)
    Cardin (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    MA
    Kerry (D)
    Brown (R)
    Y
    U
    1
    0
    MI
    Levin (D)
    Stabenow (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    MN
    Klobuchar (D)
    Franken (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    MS
    Cochran (R)
    Wicker (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    MO
    Bond (R)
    McCaskill (D)
    N
    Y
    1
    1
    MT
    Baucus (D)
    Tester (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    NE
    Nelson (D)
    Johanns (R)
    Y
    N
    1
    1
    NV
    Reid (D)
    Ensign (R)
    Y
    N
    1
    1
    NH
    Gregg (R)
    Shaheen (D)
    N
    Y
    1
    1
    NJ
    Lautenberg (D)
    Menendez (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    NM
    Bingaman (D)
    Udall (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    NY
    Schumer (D)
    Gillibrand (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    NC
    Burr (R)
    Hagan (D)
    N
    Y
    2
    0
    ND
    Conrad (D)
    Dorgan (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    OH
    Voinovich (R)
    Brown (D)
    N
    Y
    1
    1
    OK
    Inhofe (R)
    Coburn (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    OR
    Wyden (D)
    Merkley (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    PA
    Specter (D)
    Casey (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    RI
    Reed (D)
    Whitehouse (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    SC
    Graham (R)
    DeMint (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    SD
    Johnson (D)
    Thune (R)
    Y
    N
    1
    1
    TN
    Alexander (R)
    Corker (R)
    N
    N
    2
    0
    TX
    Hutchison (R)
    Cornyn (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    UT
    Hatch (R)
    Bennett (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
    VT
    Leahy (D)
    Sanders (I)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    VA
    Webb (D)
    Warner (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    WA
    Murray (D)
    Cantwell (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    WV
    Rockefeller (D)
    Manchin (D)**
    Y
    N
    1
    1
    WI
    Kohl (D)
    Feingold (D)
    Y
    Y
    2
    0
    WY
    Enzi (R)
    Barrasso (R)
    N
    N
    0
    2
      Total
    Party
    Yea
    Nay
    Unknown
    Dem
    55
    1
    0
    GOP
    2
    37
    3
    Indie
    2
    0
    0




    Total
    59†
    38
    3
      *GOP Allies
    Kirk
    IL
    1. When in the House, he consistently voted in favor of gay rights
    Collins
    ME
    1. Collins voted against banning SSM federally in 2006; she also dismantled the arguments against DADT repeal, many of which put forth by her own GOP colleagues
      **Democrats who are likely to vote against repeal
    Manchin
    WV
    1. During the DADT hearings on December 2 and 3, 2010, Manchin expressed his concerns of chaplains leaving the military if the policy was repealed
    2. Although Manchin is seen as a moderate, his voting record parallels that of a "Blue Dog"
      †Notes
  1. 60 Yea votes are needed to pass the NDAA, which will repeal DADT
  2. Unknown projections are assigned Senators who are fence sitters on this issue
  3. This vote can only pass with full Democratic support, as well as support from at least two or three Republicans, depending on how Joe Manchin (D-WV) votes
  4. Any extra yea votes will likely come from Scott Brown (R-MA) or Olympia Snowe (R-ME); one shouldn't rely too heavily on Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
  5. Possible Outcomes:
    1. Scenario I:  59-41 Fail; see above
    2. Scenario II:  61-39 Adopted; two of three Senators (Brown [MA], Snowe [ME], or Manchin [WV]) voted for repeal
    3. Scenario III:  62-38 Adopted; Brown [MA], Snowe [ME], and Manchin [WV] all voted for repeal
    4. Scenario IV: 63-37, Adopted;  full support from all "fence-sitters" and from Manchin [WV]
      These projections are my opinions and projections personally and is not based on scientific polling